Political rants

@animekid Can you give an example?

@verucassault @projectotakux My apologies, I'm told that I can be very bad with wording or explaining things at times. For example let's say there's a content creator that regularly puts out new content. Someone(A) comes up and says that all the content is lazy and low budget and if they cared about their viewers they would make better content that wasn't so lazy. When someone(B) tries to point out how to content might not be the best but it also isn't exactly lazy content and they give a few reasons why it isn't exactly lazy content and it requires some work the other person(A) respond with something along the lines of saying "Just admit you're defending a lazy content creator and go". Is person (A) correct and are they defending a lazy content creator or are they explaining another possible point of view? In this example is it defending someone to point out that the person isn't exactly lazy or is it explaining that the person isn't completely right and that they could be wrong because they might not understand all the work that goes into it? Is defending and explaining the same thing or are they different? I hope that clears things up a little bit.

fgj'hlddddd' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNJv-Ebi67I

@animekid Both sides are based in opinion. Person A makes a statement and Person B counters with reasons/logic (according to perspective, of course) as a means to inform or educate. There's a 50/50 chance Person B can change Person A's opinion with the flip side of that being no change in opinion. Whether it's defending or explaining would be based on how you personally feel about the content creator. You can feel no personal ties to the content creator, but still take a stance to counter an argument; as to play Devil's Advocate. I think when you have some sort of invested interest, would you be in a position to defend. ***I'll add, you can explain to defend but you can't defend to explain. Meaning, the more based in facts, the stronger the argument.

Me after buying 4 cases of water from one store and then some more from another store https://i.redd.it/mxld3pte5ai41.jpg

Nonetheless i am now prepared for the shortages should they come to pass. And i was early enough that it doesnt hinder the other people panic buying in the future

Saw my first lets go brandon billboard https://youtu.be/1bcZyvGvOcA

Y the Last Man isn't going to be renewed on FX. Guess it didn't pull in enough views.

Senate stock disclosures: https://sec.report/Senate-Stock-Disclosures https://www.statnews.com/feature/prescription-politics/federal-full-data-set/ More than two-thirds of Congress cashed a pharma campaign check in 2020, new STAT analysis shows WASHINGTON — Seventy-two senators and 302 members of the House of Representatives cashed a check from the pharmaceutical industry ahead of the 2020 election — representing more than two-thirds of Congress, according to a new STAT analysis of records for the full election cycle. Pfizer’s political action committee alone contributed to 228 lawmakers.