debate

you do know that the majority of farms are created to feed livestock right? so no live stock means no deforestation which means more oxygen? plus the C02 that cows produce is eliminated so i do not give my money to the people that torture and kill animals am i doing less harm than you?

the root fo the actual problem is humanity's exponential growth which is causing us to need more land to the farm which both hurts plants and animals and even then if you only farm plants your still harming the planet because you still need land to farm for those plants.

techly yes because it will cause moter vehicles which are used for farming to be an increase not to mention the materials needed to make them

the C02 from cows is worse than with cars, and im a neet so i dont go anywhere anyways the majority of farms are used for live stock so if we eliminate live stock the number of farms will go down they will, it is just a fact so ill ask again am i doing less harm than you

yes you are because again there are other effects that are needed to actually get the materials to run those farms such as oil for the vechials and or equipment or metal needed to build them

this is just on animals not cars or anything just about animals so if im doing less harm and you wish to do less harm why dont you do what i did and stopped giving your money to the people that kill and torture animals? you yourself said you dont want to cause harm and would rather kill yourself than harm a plant or dog so by your own logic wouldnt you be vegan as you admitted it causes the least harm?