debate

I can't really argue ethics with someone so diametrically opposed to the other side can I? I mean if it were facts based then I could come up with arguments about superior nutrition or accessibility, etc. But if Lamby is morally opposed to a meat and animal based diet then no amount of logic would change her mind would it? I mean I could try but really it would just boil down to morals

its so frustrating and cowardice ;w; like "ye i COULD easily beat you, but i choose not to, now hear what i have to say but i wont read a retort cause im SO BUSY but not too busy to read this thread and post this comment~"

hey don't start attacking him laby-neechan, you must let him think what he wants. debating is choice! if he thinks debating morals is no use, then he thinks debating morals is no use!

i guess i could argue the accessibility like, vic, why arent you vegan? im sure i could debate it that theres no reason except mouth pleasure

debating is a choice and so is coming onto this thread to post one thing in a debate thread just to not debate >w>/ alepho is a coward~

understand eachother isnt what debates are about, its what discussions are about >w> debates have clear winners

yep! you can have a discussion about morals but not a debate about them. in discussions you change people's mind, and in debates you trash people who have the wrong facts.