Political rants

Damage? The ability to set up in advance? No warning? Instantaneous results? The fact you can make it relatively easy (you know cuz terrorist in the middle east do this), the fact that if you remove guns they will use this instead? The columbine shooting i believe also had bombs but they didnt go off, you can survive shootings with minor injury, bombs leave life long affects sometimes. Often harder to defuse vs an active shooter because you need actusl specialists to remove them vs a shot to the head of an active shooter.

kk, so whats the point basically? whats the point in saying that bombs are more powerful than a gun? this may have gotten lost along the way

im asking your point why does this matter to the gun violence discussion bacially

well if ifs and buts were coconuts then world hunger would be solved, but the fact is this is extremely common in novice bomb builders it wont solve the problem, but it'll help it again, your using a defeatist argument i could use your argument for legalizing all drugs, because people are gonna smoke the street stuff why not have the government regulate it and it'll be safer/

well no, im explaining what your argument does you cant just say 'well people will hurt other people anyways so what doesnt it matter' that's an appeal to futility people will die in car accidents, so why enforce seatbalts/ everyone's gonna die, so is murder so wrong/ what I'm proposing is harm reduction, harm reduction is what you do even if you cant completely eradicate the issue