debate

@mio https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2003447

"i can explain it in a sentence social contract is the majority of people agreeing that one this is fine, and there for giving up the rights of a minority in favor for the whole of the majority" Daaaaaamn you got it. You really dunked me there. I should have just stated that sentence. Oh god. I'm such an idiot. Well, I guess I'm 0-2 now in debates.

Lamby on the murder thing you literally created a nonsensical loop Murdering is subjective bad, but you wouldn’t wanna be murdered cause that would be bad for you, but it could be argued that killing you would not be bad but killing is bad but.... etc. It just goes on, that neither proves subjective or disproves objective morality

It feels like your arguing some sort of pin hold strategy lamby that involves the forcing of outcomes and doubles down on inconsistency by throwing in questions tbh.

ill agree the dog thing was fucked why ship a dog from another country because you like that type? and then cramming it into a tiny apartment? a wolf dog? its moronic and very unethical HOWEVER i will defend it by saying his wife wanted it and not him, but doesnt justify him aiding in this but with proper farming does it still result in the anime being killed for food? why does the farming being proper change anything? yeah they had hardening of the arteries (cant remember what its called xD) the eskimos actually live longer living off junk food then when they were eating a "natural" diet that consisted heavily on meat indigenous tribes people still are at risk for heart related illnesses, so its not really advantageous for us to be eating the amount for meat we eat, or even the amount they eat " but we don’t have to and I don’t think not everyone can do that lazy or not lazy." that kinda sounds like an appeal to futility xD youv said this before so idk if your joking or not atm, just saying gotcha statement? which would that be? cause what you said kinda sounds like he just pointed out inconsistencies instead og being a "gotcha" xD hence why questioning and hypotheticals are important to an ethics based debate i can link some videos of vegan gains debates where he fucking smashes his opponent xD iv seen all his debates and the onyl debate he ever had to concede in was the debate against destiny, and thats only because destiny appealed to social contract AND DID IT RIGHT he said he absolutely would shit someone who came into his house, because they violated the social contract and deserve no moral consideration this is how you remain constant without being a fence sitter but because he agreed to this he agreed he didnt care about human or animal lives, and said hed kill a cat and feel nothing bad about it so basically a sociopath

I LOATHE DESTINY he is actually abysmal and annoying ukbw4aawiajco4wcani4wc4noibaw4noi I just don’t care for VeganGains as a person or Destiny. They’re like dead memes to me The gotcha is if your incostent at anytime anything that could be said as consistent as in response to the inconsistencies just makes others look bad. Tbh remember VeganGains when he was a hot topic and got shitted on by bearing everytime and could not actually win, as well as destiny imploding against ppl like JF and others. Was a fun time in blood sports before it kinda died down with a lot of community incidents But will never be as funny as Sargonof “Stop making fun of my suit” Akkad losing to Richard Spencer and getting triggered I mean I frequent those communities but I don’t engage in the debates I just like watching cause it’s funny as hell though everyone has kinda change and gone their separate ways over the past 3yrs of seeing these ppl