debate

You have the freedom of giving your child up after birth but that's not right even though you said aborting the child in the womb before birth is somehow morally right because of the woman's life being affected? Tell me how that is the best choice minus the imprinting process. Because love can be a motivator to want that child to live the best life they could.

i already answered the adoption issue "i disagree with the adoption thing because having a baby alters your body, your in constant discomfort for 9 entire months and you can die during child birth, even if its a small chance, it still happens not to mention when a woman gives birth shes a mess of hormones and can imprint on the baby. can you imagine how hard it would be to give up that child then?" can you respond to my question regarding when you have sex?

That's the same as russian roulette. You play it not thinking of the what ifs. Only a certain percentage of women do experience complications during child carrying.

@solid_snake95 lemme ask you this, its another good hypothetical there's a lab that's on fire, inside there's a baby and beside it there is a couple of boxes of cells that are dividing, in the motion of creating a fetus do you save the baby, or the boxes of dividing cells?

wait, lemme redo that a woman, or a box of dividing cells that's more analgus

If you have knowledge that its a soon to be baby in there then yes. 5 months is where you can recognize the baby forming at that. I would sooner kill myself and save those two children than choose between them. You have two arms.

no no, a full grown woman, or a box of cells that are dividing theyr not at the fetal stage, theyr still in petree dishes does this change your answer at all?

Yes I would still save that petri dish. You are talking to someone who saves caterpillars and cries over not being able to save dying squirrels who get ran over here. Better question since you now know that it is a baby forming in that box, would you play ignore it and walk away without any regret?