debate

Eptopic pregnancies might throw a monkey wrench into the whole "life saving" morality stance. Save the baby or the mother?

ok so my rebuttle would be a hypothetical if you get in a car accident and the person you hit had his liver destroyed, so the government told you that you have to act as his new liver for 9 months, is the government moral in ordering you to do so (idk my brain is super smooth right now so if i misspell anything [more then usual] please tell me and ill clarify)

No because you didnt CHOOSE to be in an accident. But you can however choose not to have a baby by simply usong condoms while its not a fail safe there are other methods to make sure you are double safe and if you want the ultimate safety measure how about celibacy. As for situations where its literally life or desth for the mother the obvious choice would be the mother. Unless the mother trades her life for the baby. But in those cases there is no guarantee the baby would live so you could potentially have both die

my stance is i do think abortion is murder, but who am i to tell someone else that its too subjective

@hell_hound7 the woman doesn't choose to get pregnant, its a possible side effect of sex just like getting into an accident is a possible side effect of driving

You dont have to tell someone killing a baby is murder...they just go to jail. Literally same energy. Most of the people who do get abortions are scared teens orbpeople not ready for the responsibility yet wer adult enough to do the deed sometimes without even using protection. Its like having sex with a crackwhore you may or may not get aids. Would you risk it? Whatever comes of that decision ur stuck with for life....baby is same energy