Anonymous confessions!

@990 "I want to smell Sadjester's foot" https://madovermarketing.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/wait-say-what-gif.gif ...oooh, now I know why they sent that...it's because of...

"or maybe become even more complex like bifurcating with a Feigenbaum constant!?" OK but what you are measuring is ratio as a function of time, not ratio vs fertility, which is where you see bifurcations and potentially a Feigenbaum constant. Bifurcations occurring in the graph of a ratio as a function of time would mean that it you would receive two data points in a single period in time. If you are suggesting that the fertility would be changing in time, and thus would lead to a different asymptotic behavior of the graph, it still doesnt really make since to do this comparison because the fertility would have to increase at a perfectly constant rate forever in order to possibly get a Feigenbaum constant, which is not only unrealistic (since there would not be any incentive for fertility to rapidly increase), it would be impossible given that the probability of this happening would be zero. That, as well as if the fertility is changing then your previous estimation of the asymptotic behavior of the graph would not have been the ACTUAL asymptotic behavior oh the graph and therefore, any notion of suggesting the existence of a Feigenbaum constant would be completely ridiculous. Am I missing something here? It would be much easier to just to say that the ratio as a function of time will take on the form of an infinite sum of sines and cosines; which is unambiguously true.

@MMF i know i am measuring ratio as a function of time, i did not mean to say that we can see the fertility changing and thus see a bifurcation starting! U took it in a wromg direction. What i did was explore the possibility that the equation governing this thread might be similar to population dynamics and then explore the possibility that the fertility might be quite low so we may have a stable ratio eventually, or the fertility might be >3 so we may have a ratio which eventually fluctuates between numbers or fertility might be >3.9 so we may have a ratio which wont fix down to any number and be chaotic (the last case being extremely unlikely) I can show u it's possible that the equation might be similar to population dynamics: Take R = ratio = cx(1-x) Where c be a constant, x be the (no. Of confessions)/thread thus the past ratio. It shows that ratio is proportional to past ratio(x) and at the same time x can cause increased activity by users so also has a negative effect on the ratio (thus the (1-x)) Even if it follows it, we cannot confirm or calculate the Feigenbaum constant here coz we arent plotting it against fertility... But if we calculate this equation for different sites with active confession threads then it is possible to plot it against the fertility.

^tbh when i said that intially i wasnt very serious :v

Oh OK, thanks for the clarification. When you said "like bifurcating with a Feigenbaum constant!", I thought the implication was that the function would have a Feigenbaum constant. My bad, I guess I just misunderstood your statement. But yeah, I know you weren't serious XD I just wanted to play along

^even though u were playing along.. u inspired me to calculate this from other sites :v I might do it in my free time, i am quite curious now >.>