Civil War Is Coming

@Gudmoore welp, I'll bite: Question 1: Do you think trans should have to disclose their birth sex? They don't think they should have to. I honestly don't really care. It's their life, if they're uncomfortable with disclosing it then they should have the freedom not to. Question 2: Would you knowingly date a trans? If they never disclosed sex and you just find out, would you dump em? Knowingly? Probably not, just not really my thing. If I found out later on I wouldn't just have a kneejerk reaction and dump them right away, especially if I dated them for a while in the first place. Question 3: Would you allow a trans to watch your kids alone? What kind of question is that? I wouldn't let anyone I don't know well to watch my kids alone, it doesn't matter if they're male, female, trans, or identify as a fucking attack helicopter. People are people man. You probably should come up with a new question for number 3, that just sounds like some common fearmongering BS.

Yeah, your ego is out of control. That's pretty typical for Communists though. Always thinking they're the brightest bulb in the pack. And you really haven't debunked anything. Again, read the book widely known as the Communist manifesto. Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals. You fall right in with the young and naive Communist crowd I was talking about. I really don't know what reality you live in thinking that debating means ignoring facts inconvenient to your rhetoric. Edit: In before, "not real Communism".

Lumping conservatives together is a lot like lumping any other group together. There's a vocal minority and a silent majority. What you perceive as the "typical" conservative, is not at all typical. The same kinds of mistaken observations are made of liberals on the other side of the fence, too. A lot of the differences in both political parties are simply due to what each side thinks the future will look like given any particular changes. It's complete speculation based on gut feeling. Some back up their feelings with statistics, but the evidence swings both ways, and so the eternal debate is ever ongoing. But the quickest way for us to work together with each other to produce paradise on Earth is for all of us to understand that everyone really is just trying to make things better, and that they have plenty of good reasons for feeling the way they do.

in fox queens mind, he thinks anectdotes are should be something that should be believed on a whim. gudmoore didnt fail to debunk your anectdotal evidence, because anectdotal evidence is bullshit to begin with. if anything, the burden on proof falls on you. also if youre as intelligent as you claim to be you wouldnt be lumping groups of people together in one hivemind and throwing your own arguments under a bus. you should also learn how trends work and what the word means because your silly wave analogy is how trends basically function: they come and go and you are arguing that this entire thing is like a wave which is basically agreeing with gudmoore "The reasons terrorist attacks are rising in statistics is mostly because today it's no longer possible to hide it from the public." "Yes we might have a bit of a wave of increased activity but those waves are a recurring thing trhough history and not just a trend of today" so what is it? is there increased activity or are people just reporting it better? make up your mind

if you like the other side, you should look into the new farcry game lol... okay thats grim there are extremest in every faith, race or ideal. Don't let a few apples ruin the barrel