debate

Ur panels mean nothing tho XD same way video evidence meant nothing. There is literally a video explaining his character and i dont even have to do it. Im not the best at conveying my ppint but i 100% agree with everything said in the video just watch. https://youtu.be/q7p6_rT918I Just within the first 2 minutes he kills ur entire argument. While using the same points i have

i never said video evidence meant nothing i said i didnt wanna watch a video. how do my panels mean nothing when they are depicting what I'm telling you?

i said i didnt wanna watch it because its about a character i don't like again, the video obviously means something if there evidence in it and because it takes 5 seconds to read a manga panel you want me to sit through a 13 min video. if i sit through that vid i need to be rewarded if i sit through it and debunk it you gotta admit I'm right

Nah dont watch it because it basically goes over everything i said i thought maybe if you heard it in word form yoi would get it. But probably not even then so yeah. Imma just say subaru is better than kaneki. Kaneki is literally the worst example you have brought me and i was willing to let you redeem yourself. So many character have better character development even down to fucking light yagami but kaneki nah. Ur acting on emotions rn, because even i have said i can pick a better character that isnt even from rezero and beat kaneki with them. Btw thats 3 characters now.

Actually in terms of realism light yagami is probably a better match for subaru. They depict how a human would act if they had the power of god. Not in terms of smartness but the trickery, and twisted self warped version of themseleves.

lol what homura has to kill herself to reset time after all of her friends die repeatedly and you think light yagami is more similar to subaru?? the sociopath that murdered hundreds of people?? like what because they have... god powers? by that definition doesn't every op character count as a good match for subaru...??? so madokami at the end of peulla magi is a good comparison to subaru xD?? what xDD btw i picked kaneki because wer talking TRAUMA. T.R.A.U.M.A. both have inarguably gone through traumatizing events. you don't even understand my gripes with subaru. I'm mad that he breakdown and goes through traumatic shit and it never lingers. iv said this so many times. that's why i compared him to kaneki, a character that also went through hell and actually changed because of it, like an actual person would

Or we do understand your gripes with Subaru and you can't comprehend that we disagree. You say it never lingers for Subaru and yet the trauma caused is literally a running theme in Season 2 so much that at one point Otto has to call him out on it because of how Subaru is acting weird and very calm in situations he shouldn't be calm in. In fact return by death desensitized him to many things or his own personal flaws made him unable to initially get people on his side. Like the villagers in season 1 or Garfield in season 2. We also learn that the witches scent alone is not enough reason for Rem to have killed Subaru in season 1 and is instead linked to either his personality and/or actions which he changes as a result of understanding that he needs to learn about other people in order to progress. in fact In arc 1 where he first got killed by Elsa twice he has to conquer his pride and call out for help in the alleyway. If he didn't do that you after have the entire Pride What if story line where he became a bad guy. So yea he has very early character development. There are several points in the story where if he didn't have character development it would have went a different way so much so that they have their own spin-off stories.

So I was thinking and remembered a debate I had with my friends about abortion I think it should be limited. My friends however think the opposite and their main argument was that it's not alive, but if you take a trip back to biology in order for something to be considered alive it needs to meet 3 requirements. One requirement is whether it grows and the embryo does grow that's pretty much all it does. The second requirement was if it reproduces, you might think that it's a no, but if you remember correctly there are 2 ways for something to reproduce they can go about it sexually or they can split in 2 and sometimes embryos do split into 2 creating twins. If I remember correctly the final requirement was to consume and an embryo does do that as well. After that argument my friends also said that some people can't afford a kid which is why it's important to get it and I replied that they could be put in an orphanage or something like that and he replied with the world is cruel and they would just be depressed. I just wanted to say shut your depressed ass up just because you hate the world it doesn't mean everyone else does too, but they're my friends and that might've been insensitive to say. Another argument I heard was that it violates our rights, but like the government is allowed to take away some rights in order to protect us that's one of the foundations of government. The final argument i've heard was why bring more kids into the world when their are already tons suffering and to that I say stop acting ignorant since their are many efforts to help people in need which are working here's a quote from worldhunger.org to prove my point "The proportion of undernourished people in the world has declined from 15 percent in 2000-2004 to 8.9 percent in 2019." Just want to hear some other arguments people use to defend abortion