Political rants

Remember, don't be a sheep guys! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJClkmOZ108 https://i.ani.me/0339/8358/wojak_brain.jpg

@daggerfella It is a completely fair question. Either Trump declassified everything or the FBI planted everything. Both statements from Trump cannot be true. Otherwise, that would be a contradiction. If someone does not engage critically with the question and keeps believing in logical contradictions. Then one can call them stupid for believing stupid beliefs. Sorry not sorry. In fact, I would argue than anyone that believes in logical contradictions is hyper partisan. If someone believes in contradictory logic from the right. Then they are right-wing partisan hacks. They are drinking that right wing Kool aid. People on the right deserve to be called stupid for firmly believing in contradictions. Sorry not sorry. https://i.ani.me/0327/2911/grey.jpg Let's assume for a second that pointing out logical contradictions is hyper partisan. Well then, here is a logical contradiction from the left. BLM states that their movement is peaceful. Yet we see buildings burning. Is it not a contradiction to say that it is a peaceful protest while buildings are burning? Oh no, no, no. Questioning self-contradictory logic is "gotcha style gonzo hyper partisanship bullshit." I'm sure you would say that about logical contradictions on the left. If someone believes in contradictory logic from the left. Then that person is a left-wing partisan hack. They are drinking that left wing Kool aid. People on the left deserve to be called stupid for firmly believing in contradictions. Sorry not sorry. https://i.ani.me/0327/2911/grey.jpg Questioning contradictory logic is hyper partisan. Yeah, make that make sense. Keep drinking that Kool aid if you want to believe in contradictory nonsense. I won't stop anyone for believing what they believe. But best believe I'll make fun of it or laugh if I see stupidity. Anyone is free to laugh or call me stupid if I say some stupid shit. But you better back up why you think it's stupid. Otherwise I'll reverse uno card Lol. https://i.ani.me/0327/2911/grey.jpg Here is an actual example of a question that is hyper partisan. Is Trump racist? Instead of critically engaging with Trump's statements. People on the left sometimes gave their subjective feelings about Trump. He's a masochist, he's racist, he's this, he's that. Not critically engaging with what Trump says and instead just bashing him with labels is actual hyper partisan bullshit. Exposing logical contradictions with what Trump says is not hyper partisan, because contradictions critically question the rocky foundation of the premises that Trump believes. https://i.ani.me/0327/2911/grey.jpg Please don’t give me the nonsense response that exposing stupid contradictions is divisive. Therefore, it’s hyper partisan because it’s divisive. If the truth is divisive, then so be it. In politics, especially in politics. The truth is more important than people’s feelings. If it’s divisive and it hurts people’s feelings. Well, whoopty fucking doo. I’ll rather be it divisive by exposing contradictory political nonsense rather than everyone holding hands singing Kumbaya while believing stupid self-contradictory nonsense.