Political rants

Right, I don't buy that Trump cheated in the 2020 election. The Hildabeast is just that unlikable in her own party. And Biden is just barely more so. Remember, this is the same guy who said this. (Seriously, next election, watch the democratic caucuses. They're very revealing.) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwVrg6UtxXQ

FBI intelligence which i honestly dont believe, but because they said it im just gonna use as an example. Said russia was going to interfere in our election. But so was china and iran. Iran is a stretch idfk how they would interfere, but whatever. Anyway i think they said there was an attempt from all parties but china for some reason decided not to. Why? Why would china decide not to? Why did every party but china decide they arent gonna influence the election when they have their hands in almost every aspect of our government? How did russia despite knowledge of them going to interfere STILL interfere? Maybe all this is a bunch of lies? But who knows. The FBI said it was true so.

I honestly think the entire government is corrupt at this point. FBI, congress, treasury, legislative, executive. All of them. As long as foreign entities are able to give donations to certain individuals it will remain that way. And too many people have power over the entirety of the country. Im honestly moving for a state ran government and federal intervention IF NECESSARY. The states know whats best for their people.

Yeah, but you know how foreign interference in elections works, right? They aren't mainly hacking into voter machines and changing or magically creating votes. They likely aren't even voting. What they do is fan the propaganda. Reach out to radicals and try to normalize and spread their beliefs to foster resentment in the current system. (Not gonna lie, Anarchists are often prime targets for propaganda assets, and you certainly had a lot of libertarians in the 'alt right pipeline' who got red-pilled to the point of antisemitism.) That's why many anarchists and libertarians are very careful when it comes to what could be astroturfed movements. This is something a nation led by a former KGB agent would excel at. So that part certainly fits their modis operandi. China? Yeah, they are another geopolitical rival, and I find it hard to believe they would pass the opportunity to jump in where there's an opening. I have to wonder if they just knew the FBI was onto them and allowed them to see only what they wanted them to see. Basically casting a smoke screen and getting some of their agents out while others burry their way deeper in. By the way, unrelated, but one of the largest local businesses in Lancaster just got bought by one of those Russian businesses that basically just dismantles them for all they're worth before firing all of them. Have to wonder why the CIA and FBI just let them do that shit.

Because certain aspects of our foundations are outdated. Such as free speech, yeah free speech is free but it also does nothing to protect the speech of others from being violated by private entities that can censor you. Ofc our founding fathers never thought of that, they were still communicating via handwritten letters. But anyway there is nothing stopping foreign governments from buying our land and moving assets in. Ofc we can always seize their land but now you have to worry about well why can the government just seize land? See there are loopholes and no one talks about it. But i truly believe these are talks that are being ignored. And you can say well im gonna run for office. But how? These corrupt people are basically having campaigns funded, being bought out, have the capabilities to out campaign you so basically its all just corrupt cycle of corruptoon.

That's their game. They want you to feel helpless. But more and more, we get the populace progressives in office despite their cycles and funding. Ever wonder where that Cortez person came from? She wasn't establishment, that was her opponent. Hell, you almost had Gillum as a governor in Florida. I guarantee you, no one in the establishment predicted he'd get so close. But there have been other victories here and there. Be it good or bad in your eyes, they are the grass roots, and ultimately want to guide the party in the direction the voters want it to go in, rather than the DNC.

This right here is how foreign countries influence US politics along with all other levels of society. I can confirm that most what what he says is true. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9TviIuXPSE

I'ma save that for tomorrow because it sounds really interesting and I'm actually past my bedtime... Wait, is that Teacup? https://memeguy.com/photos/images/this-explains-my-sleep-schedule-to-well-433439.jpg

You didn’t rebut anything of what I said. I said that the scientific method is an iterative method that requires the formation of a hypothesis. Experiments for said hypothesis. Analysis of the data. Formation of a conclusion. Finally, publishing the results. Each step is required for the scientific method. I will ask you. What experiments did the anarchist conduct on liberals and conservatives? What data did the anarchist produce from his experiments? Where’s the analysis for his data. If the anarchist did not conduct any experiments. Then, the anarchist did not produce any data. Therefore, the anarchist cannot analyze nonexistent data sets. If you're missing experiments and analysis of the data. Then, it is not the scientific method. The anarchist stated that he read some research about liberals and conservatives. Reading and analyzing research, then forming your own conclusion. Is not the scientific method. That is simply critical thinking. I still think you have a fundamental misunderstanding on how the scientific method works. Here’s a diagram on the scientific method. Each step is required for the scientific method. The experiment and analysis of the data is arguably the most important steps in the scientific process. https://i.ani.me/0304/2065/the_scientific_method.svg.png The videos that you posted had absolutely nothing to do with the scientific method. I’m assuming that you posted the video to show, what you think is BS. Then you posted a counter video to expose the BS from the first video. You would have a much better argument if David Packman actually used the scientific method to discredit Fox news. But David Packman used some basic rationale and Spanish language skills. Basic rationale and language skills isn’t sufficient for the scientific method. You think that the scientific method can help in clearing out BS. I also think that scientific method helps in clearing out BS. But how the anarchist and most political commentators come to their conclusions. Is not via the scientific method. But via a fusion of feelings, critical thinking, rationale, bad logic, good logic, fallacies, biases etc. When you state that if someone “Just use the [scientific] process. And you look at a situation from as many angles as possible, confirm what assets are actually on the board, how they are moved by both parties, and to who's benefit. Who financially backs them, and what's their incentive.” What you stated falls under observation, questions, and research. Which are some sections of the scientific method, but not all. Experiments, analysis and conclusion are also part of the scientific method. If you’re missing any sections of the scientific method. Then it isn’t the scientific method. What you described is critical thinking with some principles of the scientific method. @chocopyro