Political rants

I just read a couple of sources to give you an idea of a definition but thought it was bull because I could have replaced a few key words and those descriptions would have fit left ideologies as well. I think a more interesting distinction is what makes someone an extremist in their leanings. There are psychological identifiers that are the same on both sides. https://www.sv.uio.no/c-rex/english/groups/compendium/what-are-the-psychological-characteristics-of-people-holding-far-right-beliefs.html

There are anarcho-capitalists so I will assume there can be anarcho-communists. And either can be terrorists or extremists.

Hell yes there are. Watch out for them. https://i.ani.me/0271/2769/116372121_10216780595289248_2665453285324189160_n.jpg

Well, the way capitalism is structured is actually very similar to feudal society. And that's not an accident, as a lot of the OG capitalists were former aristocrats who needed a way to stay in power. Of course the peasantry and yeomen fulfill the same role as the working class and middle class. The king is the federal government, the donor class are the nobility, the church is basically the same, even if its power has been waning lately. Too much capitalism just makes it a kingdom with a weak monarch, but powerful lords, dukes, and bishops. Too much authoritarianism just makes it a powerful king and the people on the bottom tend to give out under the pressure. Too much communism or anarchism, and the peasantry has the power! (Oh yeah, guilds = the trade unions) That of course is a gross simplification, but I hope I got my point across.