Political rants

I always made it clear and sound I am a rightist. I just don't support pro-govern points like herd because I find some common ground with Bolsonaro or Dump or because I dislike progressives with a passion.

@Veru, I will not reveal who I work for just yet. https://media.tenor.com/images/c8937eb2ee8d6b6ee71defac33596278/tenor.gif @nabel it's a reference to the show in my icon. I'm no troll, nor was I trying to offend you.

Point is. Every convinced neocon is considered Far-Right. That, or a Populist. That lack of insight on Far-rightism is what allows them to gain momentum. Slowly, yes. But still a breach.

@hell_hound7 Page 426: 'Also i dont direspect people who dont hold the same view as me. I respect everyone's view. I just dont have to agree with it. I can attack your argument with supporting arguments from my side. That is how a debate works. If you wish to debate that is totally cool again you are welcome. But if you have nothing to imput other than i hurt your feelings. Then idk what else to tell you. Truth hurts. Maybe this is the character development you need in your life.' ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Actually, I've posted proof several times, and all I rarely get facts in return. Just attacks on myself. While you're sitting here spamming fox news, I have yet to post ANY left leaning propaganda. Just apolitical videos, declassified reports, and other crap like that. Now Veruc has challenged me with actual info, and I respect her for it. I welcome it. I learn from it. You have posted glints of info here and there, but I learn nothing new from you, Just half assed "Aha, I gotcha"s with zero substance. And I guess it does cause me to loose patience at times. That said, when you're at your best, you're fun to debate with. Just wish you'd get out of the red swamp and look for apolitical claims to back you up more. Cause a lot of what you say can neither be proven nor disproven. Trust me here, I'm pulling hair out trying to find examples of rising anti white racism. Mostly just leads me to white bois with a persecution complex bitching about how they feel, with only circumstantial pictures and clipped audio/videos to back them up. Thaaat being said, I agree with your point here. None of us take it personally. We know what type of thread this is, and we roll with it.

I dont like web based articles very much. Most are written by journalists and they have the ability to inject whatever sort of stance they want into that article. While the news clips are not much better, how do you argue with a first hand source? For example if i post a video of a senator speaking, and you send me an article with a bunch of statistics from a source that didnt cite who it came from. Which is more credible? You can dismiss my evidence as non fact but a web based article doesnt trump video proof. Unless its coming from the government itself or the person who its based off of. Im not calling it credible.

Another thing I fucking hate on journalism is when they put fucking paywalls behind articles or their own programming. Good thing outline.com exists to save us.