2020 US Presidential Election

From what I have gathered some of the bigger debates re trans is letting minors transition (which I am not fond of) because of the development of the brain/puberty/hormones and chemical imbalances. Its not an exact science plus the potential to de-transition/re-transition. Nothing else too controversial comes to mind. The bathroom/dressing room things aren't even a big deal. Co-op that shit.

i think misandry can be found in certain places and aspects of culture, it is very, very rare, yeah xD and i don't actually hate men, as i don't hate you, frozen, its just my generalized bias thanks to my life experience

@jayashr1 i actually disagree on this children know their own gender at very, very young ages boys like boy toys and girls like girl toys they know who they are same with trans children and hormone blockers have 0 adverse effect with puberty, once someone goes off them they begin puberty kids should absolutely be allowed to be transgender, and this is very, very important because puberty is where you developed your secondary sexual physical traits, which are irreversible (aka transwoman developed sloped foreheads and big shoulders they can never undue without bone shaving)

i would say that maybe a child should have to see a child psychiatrist to be properly diagnosed, but that's the only stipulation i see being relevant to the issue

@matchesia The dominant caste of the world is comprised by white straight old men, and they have set the standards we know today, while the others were (and still are, to some extent) the underdogs of society. Progressivism is there to try and change this reality. @momoichi It would be a snowball fallacy if that didn't make any sense. Back into the Sexual Revolution's days, those who opposed it said it could evolve into gay rights at a time even straight sexual degenerates and even gay people dismissed it. It made sense... and it happened. I won't judge whether they thought is fair or unfair, as these are products of their time and I don't oppose the cause, just the current movement. Ahem, returning to the main point. The fact there is a possibility the LGBT movement might defend these causes in a distant future doesn't translate that I'm saying they are degenerate scum. That is non-sequitur. @frozenxheavens Executing them for something they don't have control is indeed imoral. But we can force castration into them, yes... hehehehe...

I don't mean to post so much of this but, again, well presented. "I’ve read all the arguments about femaleness not residing in the sexed body, and the assertions that biological women don’t have common experiences, and I find them, too, deeply misogynistic and regressive. It’s also clear that one of the objectives of denying the importance of sex is to erode what some seem to see as the cruelly segregationist idea of women having their own biological realities or – just as threatening – unifying realities that make them a cohesive political class. The hundreds of emails I’ve received in the last few days prove this erosion concerns many others just as much. It isn’t enough for women to be trans allies. Women must accept and admit that there is no material difference between trans women and themselves. But, as many women have said before me, ‘woman’ is not a costume. ‘Woman’ is not an idea in a man’s head. ‘Woman’ is not a pink brain, a liking for Jimmy Choos or any of the other sexist ideas now somehow touted as progressive. Moreover, the ‘inclusive’ language that calls female people ‘menstruators’ and ‘people with vulvas’ strikes many women as dehumanising and demeaning. I understand why trans activists consider this language to be appropriate and kind, but for those of us who’ve had degrading slurs spat at us by violent men, it’s not neutral, it’s hostile and alienating."

you say that like its a radical and bad thing the sexual revolution lead to gay rights maybe, but this is a pro, not a con and again that still doesn't make sense, because sexual revolution was also the "era of free love" which ofcourse extends to gay love why would accepting gay marriage lead to accepting a man having sex with a dog? there's a missing link here