Alignment Test

an aspect sure? but id argue nazisms foundation is fitting a mold BECAUSE theyr racist a justification for xenophobia im just saying people need laws, strict laws (in some areas less strict ofcourse) without laws and regulation wed be unhappy with laws and regulation we are happy

You're right, structure is natural. I see it as you're being too black and white. People are complex. You need to give people freedom to explore. It sounds like you want to force them to do something specific. Trust the people.

yeah its more nuanced, but thats why i think chaotics are probz just larpers (no offense ;w; just my dumb ass opinion) all humans want structure we want laws and want rules we think we dont, we think we want to be free to do as we please, like how people enjoy horror films to purge themselves of those taboo feelings by watching someone else inact them i dont trust people as far as i could throw them xD humans are TOO complex i think. we fantasize about what we would want and not the outcome or details of it. look at goths and punks, by trying to stand out and fight the cultural norm they just paved the way for that to become a norm as well the counterculture is a culture in and of itself we arent these individuals, wer all frighteningly similar, as we have to be to function as a society we romanticize what it means to be human way too much

A fair balanced law that acts as a strong foundation for the existing society to build itself on top of is acceptable. But law that restricts the society to static state in an ever changing world will result in a unhappy people. And malicious laws that prey on the weaknesses of that society and agitate it to act in an unnatural way is a worst case scenario that starts world wars.

practically im not an authoritarian, i think unless we had perfect leaders with no ulterior motives than it could and does never work to maximise the populations happiness but if we had leaders that we could trust, id probz be authoritarian yeah

Thing is I don't think any one person could run a society. Like Lamby would be good for structure then a laid back liberal guy like me would be good to balance it out so it doesn't infringe on personal freedoms. Just an example how I see that multiple people running a society to balance out each other's short comings is ideal.