debate
Lamby @momoichi
commented on
debate
Lamby @momoichi
@kuharido Actually, there was a case of a man losing his foot in an accident and he asked for it from the hospital. He then cooked and served it to his friends. His friends didn't know, which was unethical, but eating it himself or with a consenting party is totally amoral.
the reference
https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/8p5xlj/hi_all_i_am_a_man_who_ate_a_portion_of_his_own/
Ghost @kuharido
commented on
debate
Ghost @kuharido
@momoichi no I mean killing and eating people like the Aztecs. Your morals are based on the idea that animals are thinking and feeling. That plants do not think and feel. So my question is does this question of morals still apply if a person will eat any living creature even their own?
Lamby @momoichi
commented on
debate
Lamby @momoichi
@hell_hound7 Please reply to my Chinese dog festival argument, but also that's horribly untrue. If societies judge our culture then slavery or the holocaust was morally correct, which is extremely untrue.
Lamby @momoichi
commented on
debate
Lamby @momoichi
@kuharido oh, ofcourse not. to kill someone outside of their consent is immoral ofcourse. even to eat the body of someone who didnt consent to it can be argued that its immoral based on the golden rule.
Panda-kun™ @hell_hound7
commented on
debate
Panda-kun™ @hell_hound7
Society deemed slavery unethical, therefore it does not exist. But in china it exists because they arent seen as people. See how that works? When they are seen as less than human, less than animal more than object society dictated it was morally just. Us as Americans frown in it so it doesnt happen. But if an apocalypse happened who is to say it wont happen?
Panda-kun™ @hell_hound7
commented on
debate
Panda-kun™ @hell_hound7
Also for the chinese dog festival, dogs are animals all the same. I personally dont eat them just like how certain people eat chicken and turkey but not beef. I have deemed it something i dont wanna eat. But if people eat it thats on them.
Lamby @momoichi
commented on
debate
Lamby @momoichi
@hell_hound7 Society of the time deemed slavery ethical because they justified that black people weren't people. So according to your ethical system, which it sounds like your appealing to social contract, the holocaust in germany was ethical because the majority of the german people support it.
Why are you against eating dog meat if you think its morally ethical?
Panda-kun™ @hell_hound7
commented on
debate
Panda-kun™ @hell_hound7
Literally the same reason i just told you. Some people eat chicken and turkey but refuse to eat beef. I eat that stuff and refuse to eat dog. Same way you eat plants which are living creatures but not animals. It is your preference.
Panda-kun™ @hell_hound7
commented on
debate
Panda-kun™ @hell_hound7
Also the slavery thing you are basically repeating the same points i just answered. Slavery doesnt exist becauae society has deemed it so. Its just like age of consent, or age of being allowed to drink. Society says its a no no so we dont have it anymore
Lamby @momoichi
commented on
debate
Lamby @momoichi
@hell_hound7 So it's a taste thing? Do you know what dog tastes like?
I'm vegetarian because of my ethical system. Meat is the tastiest thing on the planet, after watching some documentaries I realized that it was immoral to pay for animal products so I stopped (I'm cheating now by still eating cheese and milk, but I'm going to be vegan again when I can)
"Also the slavery thing you are basically repeating the same points i just answered. Slavery doesnt exist becauae society has deemed it so." But at the time it did. So you think those slave owners at the time were morally right to own those slaves. This isn't you repeating your point, this is you not understanding mine.
Please login to post.