Civil War Is Coming

calling you out for not following your teachings isnt a personal attack, fyi "You're only trying to escalate discussions between 3 people who don't necessairy agree but have no personal issues with each other" and this is coming from where? i havent even mentioned either of those 2 people even once. i only brought up gudmoore once to bring up a point and that was brief. you are just talking outta your ass "Vaes is his name if i remember correctly. He's respected, since when we were at the national history museum, the guides already were like 'ah you don't need us, you got this guy'." stop relying on hearsay and anecdotes. also you are wrong, as small right wing parties are making some progress in the EU because of the migrant crisis happening and the incompetence of the European Union

they arent accusations, i point out clearly where you are wrong. you act like i was siding with gudmoore too when i was simply using him in my example, i didnt back up his personal attacks against you at all. show me where i involve daggerfall and beserker as well. oh wait you cant "i clearly don't rely on hearsay and anecdotes " you clearly do, seeing as how you dont cite sources, spit out anectdotes and try to pass them off as truths. i can link you back to my post if youd like explaining how each thing i pointed out is hearsay and such if you took my usage of pronouns as a personal attack thats your own insecurities talking, i told you to get over it as its just a label. i didnt attach any negative connotations to it at all and youre just playing the victim card at this point

was that supposed to be some sort of witty comeback? me typing "he" doesnt mean mean i dislike trans people. i simply dont care enough to do so, just saying

Didn't say you hated anyone, but it's disrespectful regardless to knowingly call someone who is of one gender the other. There's a difference between gender and sex, that has no hold on beliefs or how much one cares. It's a literal, fundamental difference. Now you can have your own feelings about if you think that's something that should be considered all that offensive or important, but Fox has clearly explained multiple times now that it has offended her and for valid reason. If at that point you insist on continuing in spite of calm requests and factual differences, you are indeed violating the sites policy on not being rude or obnoxious.

im not really obligated to back anything up. i havent made outlandish claims and accusations of being hateful towards others or roping in bystanders into this. if you insist im copying you then that just means you were the one stirring things up at first notice how i only said it twice and afterwards i explained my view on the matter. we can try to stretch rules and broaden definitions all day to fit those rules but i was willing to drop the subject when someone else butted in too