Random thoughts...

"sexes" panda, u don't wanna anger them xD i don't mind cuz idgaf

The rapidly changing ones are problematic. The joke/meme ones are problematic. But if a person thinks they are different... meh. Go for it.

Idrc about offending anyone, i am entitled to my opinion the same way they are entitled to believe there are more than 2 "sexes" if they tell me i cant then they are hypocrites

I mean i can believe whatever i want all day long as long as i dont infringe on anyone's rights. Words dont kill people, and neither do ideas. People's rights end where someone else's starts

enough said I was talking about something different i agree with you guys.

i have looked into it a few years ago, and basically what happened is they changed the word "gender" into meaning something different. and i'd like to quote an article here which explains it wonderfully. If you research the etymology of the word gender you discover that the word gender, up until the 1970's in academia, and up until the 2010's in the general populace, had an identical meaning to sex. Gender meant sex. Gender was used in writing and conversation in preference to the word sex, because sex also meant sexual intercourse. So to prevent confusion and so as to not evoke the thought of sex, the word gender was used. Gender meant "sex and I don't mean fucking". This meaning of gender originated back in the 17th century if I recall correctly. In the 1970s, certain non-scientific branches of academia invented an entirely new concept and attached the label "gender" to it. The concept was that the way one presents themselves in society is "gender". This historically has never been the meaning of gender. The public at large continued to use gender in the original meaning (as you will see with official forms asking for 'gender'. If they asked for 'sex', people would add a box with "yes please" on it and tick it). In the 2010s this new meaning of gender leaked out of academic circles and into the general vernacular. But it is a concept that is entirely the invention of left-leaning academics, cross citing each other repeatedly in echo chamber journals. You say there is "great variety in both", but this is not true. There is great variety in "gender as a social construct", that is, the cosmetic way people dress, do their hair etc. But there is not great variety in "sex and I don't mean fucking". Disorders of sex development (DSDs) are extremely rare and do not constitute a new sex and are recognised medically as disorders. For example, XXYY occurs in 1 in 18,000 to 40,000 male births. XXXXY occurs in 1 in 85,000 to 100,000 male births. Compare that to the "normal" male sex characteristics, or the "normal" female sex characteristics, that each occur in about 1 in 2 births. People erroneously make the claim that other conditions, like triple X syndrome, constitute a DSD (occurs in 1 in 1000 females), but because it causes no health issues or abnormal development it is not considered a DSD by the medical community. The DSD Guideline documents [http://www.dsdguidelines.org] are a trustworthy source of information and definitions.

You could also say the meaning is different, Biological gender and mental gender?

Isnt that the same as trans? Cuz trans is across so to cross genders would mean you go from biological to mental gender. But if that gender does not exist biologically then how can you be that gender?