Unpopular opinions

Just saying i dont believe women have higher standards. Men really get the worst of it. Most men dont win cases for custody of kids. Single men sometimrs arent even allowed to adopt kids compared to single females.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsvDbFxDS8M&t=12s&ab_channel=Mupple As my queen Invadervie said in this video. BE A SIMP, SEND MONEY

you dont "believe it" but its a provable fact YES men do have things bad! but whats this whataboutism your doing? just because men go through hardship doesn't mean we should ignore the women who are being harmed because of the higher standard

i mean i show you data and you say "nah not real data" what bar do i need to meet to show you this statistical fact?

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-a-woman-led-company-might-suffer-more-from-an-ethics-scandal-2019-10-28 Just read this one. I'm going to post the entire article and put in brakets my response to it. Female CEOs are held to a higher standard than their male counterparts [NOTICE HOW CATCHY THAT TITLE IS?] Published: Oct. 29, 2019 at 10:35 a.m. ET By Meera Jagannathan 4 Consumers are less likely to buy products from female-led organizations than they are from male-led organizations following an ethical failure, a new study finds [SO THIS IS THE ARGUMENT? LET'S SEE WHAT FOLLOWS...] A woman’s leadership of an organization makes consumers expect that the company will be more ethical, the study's author said, and also gives them lower expectations of the company’s competence. [I SURE WISH I HAD ACCESS TO REALLY SEE THE RESULTS OF THIS STUDY AND HOW THEY DETERMINED THIS HEAP OF BULLSHIT. BUT THAT WASN'T IMPORTANT ENOUGH TO INCLUDE IN THE ARTICLE ABOUT IT WITH SUCH A STERN TITLE AND DESCRIPTION] Personality stereotypes about female and male leaders can impact how their companies weather a major setback, a new study suggests. [SO IT'S NOT JUST GENDER BUT THEIR PERSONALITY. HOPEFULLY THEY BREAK THAT DOWN A BIT BETTER IN THIS.] [NEWS FLASH - THEY DON'T. IT'S LIKE THEY CUT THAT PART COMPLETELY OUT OF THE ARTICLE. AS WELL AS ANY PROOF FROM SAID STUDY.] Consumers are less likely to buy products from female-led organizations than they are from male-led organizations following an ethical failure, according to American Psychological Association research published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Meanwhile, the extent to which consumers penalize female-led or male-led companies for a competence failure (such as a faulty product) varies depending on the industry. Female-led companies are penalized less for competence failures, the authors found across three experiments — unless they occur in an industry in which a woman is expected to possess more expertise, like child products. Male-led companies are penalized more for competence failures in industries regarded as more stereotypically “male,” like automobiles. [THIS IS A FAIR STATEMENT "VARIES DEPENDING ON THE INDUSTRY". OF COURSE WOMEN ARE GOING TO BE HELD TO HIGHER STANDARDS WITH COMPANIES THAT INVOLVE CHILDREN, HOUSEHOLD, AND EVEN EDUCATION AND LEARNING.] What drives these disparities? People tend to associate women with “communal” traits like likability, warmth and relatability, lead study author Nicole Votolato Montgomery, an associate professor of commerce at the University of Virginia, told MarketWatch. [I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT ANY OF THE WORDS HAVE TO DO WITH GENDER. CAN MEN NOT ALSO HAVE COMMUNAL TRAITS AND ALSO BE ASSOCIATED TO LIKABILITY, RELIABILITY, ETC? HOW GENDER BIASED!] In other words, a woman’s leadership of an organization makes consumers expect that the company will be more ethical, she said. It also gives them lower expectations of the company’s competence. [WELL THAT'S JUST FUCKING SILLY AND RETARDED.] “I believe that you’re going to be a moral company because you have a female CEO,” Montgomery explained this thinking. ”But you know what? You may not be as competent.” [LIKE I SAID, SILLY AND RETARDED.] Female chief executives aren’t the only powerful women who appear to face harsher scrutiny for ethical issues. Montgomery and her co-author, UVA associate commerce professor Amanda Cowen, cite in their study an example from the 2016 presidential election: Despite documentation that then-candidate Donald Trump had made more false statements than rival Hillary Clinton, some polls showed that voters perceived him to be more trustworthy. [I WONDER IF THAT HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE EMAILS AND SECURITY VIOLATIONS AND THE FACT THAT THERE'S A HUGE BODY PILE BEHIND THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION? I MEAN... FUCK.] Women lead just 33 companies (6.6%) in the Fortune 500, and even that share is a record high. A related phenomenon known as the “glass cliff” — in which women are tapped to lead flailing companies back on course — has also been well documented, with the tenures of former Yahoo! CEOs Carol Bartz and Marissa Mayer frequently used as case studies. Female CEOs can manage perceptions of themselves by cultivating what researchers called “agentic” male personality stereotypes, Montgomery said — presenting themselves as more ambitious, independent, skilled and adept at working under pressure. If women portray themselves as such, “the penalties are actually more in line with how male-led organizations are penalized,” she said. [SOUNDS LIKE INSTEAD OF IMPROVING HOW WOMEN ARE VIEWED IN THE FORTUNE 500, THEY ARE INSTEAD TRYING TO IMMITATE MEN INSTEAD OF PUTTING FORTH THE EFFORT TO CARVE A PATH FOR THEMSELVES.] Former PepsiCo PEP, -2.31% CEO Indra Nooyi, who stepped down from her post in 2018, provided a lesson in this strategy, Montgomery said. “Indra Nooyi is a great example of somebody who has had success positioning herself as more agentic, and was able to manage activist campaigns against Pepsi and some other sorts of things that rose during her tenure there,” she said. The ways in which the popular press and organizations themselves write and communicate about CEOs can also impact perceptions during a company failure, Montgomery suggested. “Women who are written about as more independent [and] more skilled, as opposed to using more communal traits, like ‘She’s likable’ — that has implications for how consumers perceive these crises, and then their interaction with the companies,” Montgomery said. [SO A WOMAN CEO FACES A HARDSHIP IN THE COMPANY AND DESERVES A PAT ON THE BACK FOR WEATHERING IT. MALE CEO FACES HARDSHIPS AND IT'S JUST BUISNESS AS USUAL. WHAT WAS THE POINT OF THIS "STUDY" AGAIN? "Consumers are less likely to buy products from female-led organizations than they are from male-led organizations following an ethical failure..." NO PROOF OF THIS WAS EVER PROVIDED IN THIS ARTICLE. - THE END]

So men have all this going on but because women its higher standard. Where is this higher standard like what defines it? Body shaming? Fat guys also suffer due to this, men also expected to be fit or tall. Equal pay? People in china barely make enough to live let alone equal pay so irrelevant first world problems, promotion? I had more achievements over my female counter part but the system designed favored females more so i lost by default. I dont see higher standard

@Lamby Never better. Thanks for the concern. :)